Purpose: The purpose of this study is to investigate the influence otfh e athletic tenacity and positive psychological capital on the perceived performance of university athletes. Method: The 230 population samples were collected throughout university in Seoul, Gyunggi and Incheon area with convenience sampling method. Frequence analysis, conirfmatory factor analysis, correlation analysis and multiple regression analysis were performed. Results: The results of this study are follows. First, The fighting spirit which was sub-factor of tenacity showed significant influence on game satisfaction factor when the relationship between tenacity and perceived performance was analyzed. Second, The fighting spirit which wa ssub-factor of tenacity showed significan t influence on confidence factor when the relationship between te nacity and perceived performance was analyzed. Third, The resilience, self-efficacy, and psychological skills which were sub-factors of positive psychological capital showed significant influence on game satisfaction factor when the relationship between positive psychological capital and perceived performance was analyzed. Fourth, The self-efficacy and psychological skills which were sub-factors of positive psychological capital showed significant influence on confidence factor when the relationship between positive psychological capital and perceived performance was analyzed. Conclusion: In summary, the findings in this study confirm that the tenacity and positive psychological capital of university athletes have a direct or indirect influence on the perceived performance of university athletes.
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to investigate the influence otfh e athletic tenacity and positive psychological capital on the perceived performance of university athletes. Method: The 230 population samples were collected throughout university in Seoul, Gyunggi and Incheon area with convenience sampling method. Frequence analysis, conirfmatory factor analysis, correlation analysis and multiple regression analysis were performed. Results: The results of this study are follows. First, The fighting spirit which was sub-factor of tenacity showed significant influence on game satisfaction factor when the relationship between tenacity and perceived performance was analyzed. Second, The fighting spirit which wa ssub-factor of tenacity showed significan t influence on confidence factor when the relationship between te nacity and perceived performance was analyzed. Third, The resilience, self-efficacy, and psychological skills which were sub-factors of positive psychological capital showed significant influence on game satisfaction factor when the relationship between positive psychological capital and perceived performance was analyzed. Fourth, The self-efficacy and psychological skills which were sub-factors of positive psychological capital showed significant influence on confidence factor when the relationship between positive psychological capital and perceived performance was analyzed. Conclusion: In summary, the findings in this study confirm that the tenacity and positive psychological capital of university athletes have a direct or indirect influence on the perceived performance of university athletes.
(0)
(0)