동일 어간 반복 구문의 의미 특성-‘V-기는 V, V-기만 V’ 구문을 중심으로

Meaning of echoed verb construction, In general, repeated expressions are considered as something redundant, but there are repeated-verb constructions like "v-GINUN v(v-기는 v)", "v-GIMAN v(v-기만 v)" in Korean

This paper invastigate the semantic aspects of that expressions. When we used this "v-GINUN v" expression, it shows an implicature "I did it(V), but I wasn"t completely satisfied." For examples, just saying "v(먹었어).", it means just "v", however, saying "v-GINUN v(먹기는 먹었어).", it implies "I ate something, but it wasn"t perfect." In this paper, the implicature is due to following reasons. 1. "NUN", a delimiter for contrast is set up "sister members". 2. to repeat v emphasizes meaning of "v" and it divides properties consisting of "v". So it necessarily imply another sister members are dissatisfied. "v-GIMAN v" is ambiguous construction. The "MAN" attached element can be "unique in the context" or it has "emphatic use". Especially, "v-GIMAN v" used as "emphatic use", it usually appeared with an adverb like "JAL(잘)"

This paper invastigate the semantic aspects of that expressions. When we used this "v-GINUN v" expression, it shows an implicature "I did it(V), but I wasn"t completely satisfied." For examples, just saying "v(먹었어).", it means just "v", however, saying "v-GINUN v(먹기는 먹었어).", it implies "I ate something, but it wasn"t perfect." In this paper, the implicature is due to following reasons. 1. "NUN", a delimiter for contrast is set up "sister members". 2. to repeat v emphasizes meaning of "v" and it divides properties consisting of "v". So it necessarily imply another sister members are dissatisfied. "v-GIMAN v" is ambiguous construction. The "MAN" attached element can be "unique in the context" or it has "emphatic use". Especially, "v-GIMAN v" used as "emphatic use", it usually appeared with an adverb like "JAL(잘)"