상세검색
최근 검색어 전체 삭제
다국어입력
즐겨찾기0
국가지식-학술정보

Comparative Analysis of Policy Approaches in Preserving Baekje Historic Site and Gyeongju Historic Site

Comparative Analysis of Policy Approaches in Preserving Baekje Historic Site and Gyeongju Historic Site

  • 0
커버이미지 없음

South Korea boasts a rich tapestry of UNESCO-recognized cultural landscapes, including the Gyeongju and Baekje Historic Sites. Registered in 2000 and 2015 respectively, these sites are renowned for their significant cultural value but require distinct preservation efforts. This paper seeks to undertake a comparative and analytical examination of the policies implemented in these two UNESCO-listed historic areas, specifically aiming to identify areas of complementarity within the policies of the Baekje Historic Site, which was listed later. The findings shows that despite an overarching framework under the Historic City Preservation Act, local laws and regulations were nuanced and tailored to reflect regional specificities. The study highlights the potential for future policy developments to be more responsive to the distinct needs of each site and suggests a harmonized yet adaptable policy framework under the Historic City Preservation Act.

South Korea boasts a rich tapestry of UNESCO-recognized cultural landscapes, including the Gyeongju and Baekje Historic Sites. Registered in 2000 and 2015 respectively, these sites are renowned for their significant cultural value but require distinct preservation efforts. This paper seeks to undertake a comparative and analytical examination of the policies implemented in these two UNESCO-listed historic areas, specifically aiming to identify areas of complementarity within the policies of the Baekje Historic Site, which was listed later. The findings shows that despite an overarching framework under the Historic City Preservation Act, local laws and regulations were nuanced and tailored to reflect regional specificities. The study highlights the potential for future policy developments to be more responsive to the distinct needs of each site and suggests a harmonized yet adaptable policy framework under the Historic City Preservation Act.

(0)

(0)

로딩중