본 연구는 세계적으로 사용되고 있는 대학생 학습과정 조사도구들 중 NSSE, CEQ, AUSSE의 개발 배경과 변천 과정, 개발 목적, 주요 내용, 결과의 활용 다섯 가지 측면을 조사한 후 이를 비교ㆍ분석함으로써 우리나라 고등교육기관의 대학생 학습과정 조사도구 개발을 위한 정책적 시사점을 제안하는 것을 목적으로 한다. 이들을 비교한 결과 다섯 가지 준거를 통한 비교ㆍ분석 결과 대학 강의 경험을 주요 내용으로 하는 전수조사 방식의 CEQ보다는 강의와 강의실 밖의 다양한 학습 기회에 대한 학생참여도를 기준으로 대학생의 학습과정과 대학 교육의 질을 평가하는 표본조사 방식의 NSSE와 AUSSE가 우리의 고등교육 시스템에 더 적합할 뿐만 아니라 국제적 비교?분석도 가능한 조사도구로 평가되었다.
Higher education institutions in the 21st century are feeling more and more pressure to show and prove their due accountability toward the society. The fulfillment of their social responsibilities can be accomplished by teaching and research. The quality of teaching in higher education institutions have been approached from various perspectives and tried to be measured by different methods. Among others, students’ evaluation and ratings have been viewed as useful tools to evaluate the quality of education and supporting services of the institutions. This study analyzed 5 aspects of the three major student’s evaluation and engagement questionnaires: National Survey of Student Engagement, Course Experience Questionnaire, Australian Survey of Student Engagement. In comparative analysis, researchers concluded CEQ has several shortcomings to be an efficient and effective student engagement scale while it still has some merits such as offering a opportunity to every college graduate to evaluate their college teaching experience. NSSE and AUSSE, taking the sample study framework, are reviewed to be easier to be administrated and contain more plentiful information about various facets of college students’ experience and its relationship with achievements in college. This findings are expected to offer useful implications to those who develop the Korean scale of student experience and engagement.
(0)
(0)