국어과 교육과정 문서 체제 비교 연구 -2007개정 교육과정과 미국 펜실베이니아 주교육과정을 중심으로-

A Comparative Study of the Documents System of Language Arts Curriculum

The purpose of this study was to compare two curriculums Korean language arts and Pennsylvania literacy framework and academic standards for offering data to improve 2009 Korean language arts curriculum. I suggested that the curriculums a system which consists of some components. According to research results, I could find three components of curriculum system; the nature and roles of curriculum, relationship among components and style of statement. Therefore, I compared Korean language arts curriculum with Pennsylvania literacy framework and academic standards by three criteria. As the results, I purported below. Firstly, Korean language arts should offer knowledge and information for teachers to reconstruct and practice into curriculum. Secondly, implied readers should be teachers in schools and the curriculums should direct easily be understudied by teachers. Therefore people who designed curriculums have to use easy terms and style of statement. Thirdly, the Korean language curriculum needs to integrate the manual of it because the curriculum is so simple to show its significant meaning. The history of the U. S. A curriculum is longer than Koreans`. However, two countries have had different and unique environments of education. Every policy is not perfect and would change permanently. As comparing Pennsylvania literacy framework and academic standards, I could deeply explore system of Korean language arts curriculum and suggest arguments about the curriculum for a lively discussion on this subject.