중등 가정교과 임용시험 문항의 출제 경향 분석 - 2009학년도부터 2016학년도까지 -

A Trend analysis of the teacher recruitment examination for secondary Home Economics subject - From 2009 to 2016 -

본 연구의 목적은 2009학년도부터 2016학년도까지 8년간 출제된 중등 가정교사 임용시험의 문항을 ‘임용 상세화 기준’을 기본잣대로 하여 분석하는데 있다. 본 연구의 결과를 종합하면 다음과 같다. 첫째, 8년간 출제된 문항을 분석한 결과 평가 영역 12개 중 12개, 평가내용 요소 43개 중 42개가 출제되어 평가 영역 및 평가내용 요소와 출제된 문항 간의 차이가 거의 없었다. 둘째, 8년간 출제된 각 영역은 가정과교육학 93회(32.7%), 가족생활 41회(14.4%), 소비생활 31회(11.3%), 식생활 43회(15.2%), 의생활 41회(14.4%), 주생활 34회(12.0%)로 교과내용학 기본 이수과목 및 분야별 출제 비율의 차이가 크지 않았다. 셋째, 8년간 출제 빈도가 높은 영역별 평가내용 요소를 살펴보면, 가정과교육학은 ‘가정과 교수학습 방법과 실제’, 가족생활은 ‘인간발달 과정’, 소비생활은 ‘가계경제의 이해와 재무관리’와 ‘소비자 의사결정’, 식생활은 ‘조리원리 및 실습’과 ‘식생활 관리’, 의생활은 ‘의복 및 생활용품 제작’, 주생활은 ‘주거생활 문화의 이해’ 등으로 출제되었다. 이러한 결과를 바탕으로 평가 영역 및 내용에 설정된 모든 영역들이 균등하게 다루어져야 하며, 미시적 관점으로 질적인 문항 분석이 필요하겠다.

The aim of this research is to analyze the items of the Secondary School Teacher s Placement Test(SSTPT) which was submitted for 8 years from 2009 to 2016 according to detailed criteria of SSTPT . The results of this study are summarized as follows. First, according to the analysis of items which were covered for the last 8 years, it was found that there was little difference between the evaluation area, the evaluation content elements, and the questionnaires since the questions presented in the 12 items of 12 evaluation areas and 42 of 43 evaluation contents. Second, each of the items in the 8-year questionnaire are as follows. Home economics and education 93 times (32.7%), dietary life 43 times (15.2%), family life 41 times (14.4%), clothing 41 times (14.4%), housing life 34 times (12.0%), consumer life 31 times (11.3%). This shows that there is not a large difference between the basic curriculum subjects of the content education and the ratio of question items. Third, the content elements of evaluation categorized by frequency of questionnaires for 8 years are as follows. Home economics and education mainly covers ʻthe methodology of teaching and learning,ʼ Family life, ʻhuman development,ʼ Consumer life, ʻthe understanding of household economics and financial managementʼ and ʻconsumer decision making,ʼ Dietary life, ʻcooking principle and practiceʼ and ʻmanagement of dietary life,ʼ Clothing life, ʻclothing and household goods production,ʼ Housing life, ʻthe understanding if residential living.ʼ Based on these results, all the areas set in the evaluation area and content should be treated equally, and qualitative item analysis is necessary from a microscopic point of view.