중고등학생의 가정생활 가치관에 관한 연구
A Study on the Family Life Value of Middle and High School Students
- 한국가정과교육학회
- 한국가정과교육학회지
- 제7권 제1호
-
1995.0611 - 27 (17 pages)
- 2
The purposes of this research is to study the middle and high school student s value on the family life of the contemporary society. The data for this study has been collected from 808 stedents of kangwon-do by Liert-scale Type questionnaire. The data were processed by SPSS-X Program. Frequency, Percentage, Mean, Standard Deviation, One-way ANOVA, Pearson r cofficient, Step-wise multiple regression and Cronbach coefficient have been calculated and analysed. The Summary of this research is described as follows. Firstly, the overall average of value of family life was 3.25 points which reflected more or less modern tendency. Secondly, significant difference in the student s value of family life affected by environmental variables were such as sex(P<.001), school years(P<.001),group(P<.001). Thirdly, the overall average of the student s interest in the home economics was 3.74 points which reflected heigher tendency. Significant difference in the student s interest in the home economics according to environmental variables were such as sex(P<.001),school years(P<.05), living standard(P<.01), residential area(P<.001). Fourthly, the student s overall interest in the home economics and their view on the family life were correlated as follows ; Spare time(r=-.13), parents-children(r=-.12), relatives and neighbors(r=-.08)show lower correlation and household work(r=-.12), relatives and neighbors(r=-.08) show lower correlation and household work(r=.07) show higher correlation. Fifthly, the area which has closest correlation with the value on the family life was the value on family economics, whereas it has been shown that the field with least correlation was the area of supporting the spare time. Sixthly, main changes that affect the student s value of the family life were such as sex( =.43), school years( =.18), group( =-.15) and interest degrees( =-.12). These whole explanatory power was 21%.
(0)
(0)