키워드
- #공동소유
- #공유
- #합유
- #총유
- #공유자 일부의 제한물권 취득
- #관리 약정의 승계인에 대한 효력
- #공유물의 분할방법
- #조합의 사무집행 방법
- #조합재산의 소유형태
- #총유규정의 유지
- #Co-Ownership
- #Common Ownership
- #Joint Ownership
- #Collective Ownership
- #Acquisition of subordinate real rights by a common owner
- #Effect of the Administration Agreement to the Successor
- #The Partition Method of Common Property
- #The Execution of the Partnership Affair
- #The Forms of Partnership Property
- #Preservation of Collective Ownership Provisions
초록
The Korean Civil Code acknowledges three types of co-ownership;common ownership(공유), joint ownership(합유), collective ownership(총유). In case of common ownership, co-owners own separate and distinct shares of the same property. If members of the partnership own the property of the partnership, they become joint owners. Joint owners have no distinct shares of the property. Collective ownership is established when members of an association without legal personality own the same property. In February 2014, the Civil Code Revision Committee of the Department of Justice has prepared the revision draft of co-ownership provisions of the Civil Code. The main points are as following. 1. Common ownership Firstly, according to the draft, one common owner can acquire the subordinate real rights on the property commonly owed. At present, such an acquisition is not allowed, as an owner, including a common owner, cannot acquire the subordinate real rights of the property she herself owns. Secondly, the agreement among common owners regulating the administration of the common property is effective againt the successor of one common owners. The precedents have acknowledged it. The draft gives the precedents a statutory basis. Thirdly, The draft gives more discretion to the court in deciding the partition of the common property. 2. Joint ownership Firstly, the draft aims to resolve the contradiction between the joint ownership rule and partnership contract rule. According to the present Civil Code, all joint owners should consent to the disposition or alteration of the joint property, although the majority rule may be adopted by
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 공유
Ⅲ. 합유와 조합
Ⅳ. 총유 규정의 개정 유보
Ⅴ. 결론
<참고문헌>
참고문헌 (0)
등록된 참고문헌 정보가 없습니다.
해당 권호 수록 논문 (18)
- 쌍무계약해제시 반환법리와 급부부당이득과의 관계
- 일본 메이지민법 부당이득법상의 기본개념의 형성
- 부동산의 가압류채권자가 가압류 후에 그 부동산에 관하여 이루어진 채무자의 물상보증행위를 사해행위로서 취소할 수 있는가
- 인격권 침해와 부당이득반환
- 공동소유에 관한 민법 개정안
- 일본 메이지민법에서의 임대차제도와 임차권 무단양도⋅임차물 무단전대에 관한 입법태도에 관한 연구
- 민법개정안 채무불이행법에 관한 검토
- 스위스법상 동물의 법적 지위에 관한 연구
- 판례로 살펴 본 제사용 재산의 승계
- 퍼블리시티권과 부당이득
- 動産善意取得의 問題에 關한 硏究
- 목적론적 관점에서 바라 본 미국 불법행위법
- 법률행위로 인한 관습법상 법정지상권 폐지와 법정임대차 도입
- 금융실명제 하에서 예금채권의 지급과 부당이득
- 매매계약이 해제된 경우 미등기 매수인이 한 임대차의 운명
- 구분건물의 구조상 구분이 소멸된 경우의 권리관계와 변경등기
- 채권자취소권에 관한 민법개정안
- 대상청구권에 대한 입법론적 소고