상세검색
최근 검색어 전체 삭제
다국어입력
즐겨찾기0
커버이미지 없음
KCI우수등재 학술저널

채권자대위권의 법적성질

On the legal nature of the subrogation right of a creditor

  • 23

We oppose currently with the contention of the property right of management which the law prescribes to Inclusive credit security right about a legal nature of the subrogation right of a creditor In the case which the credit takes the money to be the credit, We do same contention about all both which the contention can use the subrogation right of a creditor to the requisite the insolvency of the debtor. But, In the case which the credit is not the credit to take the money, the affair to permit the subrogation right of a creditor is formed by the judgment for the credit integrity not to do the insolvency to the requisite It is said on the other hand to the credit contentment facility that we have the integrity of the responsibility property Inclusive credit security right as well the facility of the subrogation right of a creditor. In this study, the researcher examined two kind theory and got the conclusion following. The first, to do the insolvency to the requisite presented the thing has logical error. The second, It is the authority though the right of management which the Inclusive credit security right says gives the competency not to be the privilege. We are not the subrogation right of a creditor itself is the security right like the expression of a third Inclusive credit security right.

Ⅰ. 문제의 제기

Ⅱ. 채권자대위권 제도의 의의

Ⅲ. 채권자대위권의 성질에 관한 학설

Ⅳ. 검토 및 주장

Ⅴ. 결론

참고문헌

로딩중