상세검색
최근 검색어 전체 삭제
다국어입력
즐겨찾기0
커버이미지 없음
KCI우수등재 학술저널

損害賠償 豫定額의 職權減額上 參酌의 基準時와 參酌 事由

부동산 매매계약에 있어서 ‘解除 후 時價의 變動’이 참작사유로 될 수 있는가? (대상판례 : 2004. 12. 10. 선고 2002다73852)

  • 130

This article is on the liquidated damage and the mitigation in Korean civil law. In a real estate sale transaction case in which a buyer made a breach of the contract but the seller resold it to the 3rd party so successfully that the seller recovered more than he lost, the Korean Supreme court held that the liquidated damage should be limited to 50% considering his recovery. The author is of opinion that the seller might recover the liquidate damage in full in spite of the fluctuation of the market price. The author is mentioning the duty of mitigation, the assessment of damage, the time of the assessment of damage in Canadian law and other related common law cases in a perspective of comparative legal studies.

대상판례 및 사실관계]

Ⅰ. 問題의 提起

Ⅱ. 契約解除 후 時價의 變動과 損害賠償과의 關係

Ⅲ. 契約解除 후 時價의 變動과 損害賠償豫定額의 職權減額

Ⅳ. 結論

로딩중