평가인증 후 보육시설 종사자의 평가인증에 대한 인식 및 사후 관리 실태

A Study on Actual Conditions of Maintenance, Management, and the Perception of Directors and Teachers of Child Care centers following Accreditation

본 연구는 부산지역에 소재한 기관 중 평가인증을 통과한 기관의 시설장 230명과 보육교사 230명을 대상으로 평가인증 이후 제도에 대한 인식, 변화와 효과, 개선점, 그리고 인증 후 관리를 위해 어떤 노력을 하고 있는지와 그에 따른 지표의 영역별 사후 유지관리 실태를 파악하고자 설문 조사를 실시하였다. 연구 결과를 살펴보면 첫째, 평가인증 후 제도에 대한 인식은, 평가인증 유효 기간, 연차보고서 제출, 그에 따른 지표를 활용한 재평가의 적절성 여부에 반대하는 의견을 보였다. 둘째, 인증 후 효과는, 보육시설의 질적 개선과 수준을 향상시켰다고 반응을 하였고, 셋째, 인증 이후 제도의 개선 방안은, 계속적인 지원금 지급과 교사들에게 성과급 지원 등을 요구하는 비율이 높았다. 넷째, 평가인증 후 사후 유지관리 상태는, 인증지표 활용으로 수시로 점검을 하고 있으며, 평가인증 영역을 유지하기 위한 노력으로 효과적 운영 관리 및 필수항목 체크의 준수 철저와 교사교육과 자율장학을 실시하면서 사후 관리를 위해 다양한 노력을 하는 것으로 나타났다.

The purpose of this study was to bring some data for applying to maintenance and management for successful settlement of an accreditation system. For these, this study found out some changes, effects, methods of improvement for the accreditation system, how directors and teachers of the child care centers made efforts for management after the accreditation and found out actual conditions for maintenance and management according to categories of barometers after the accreditation. The results of study were as follows: First, about recognitions for the accreditation system after the accreditation, most of directors and teachers were opposed to the accreditation to the presentation of an annual report once a year and to the pertinence of revaluation by index. The teachers of national and public child care centers were somewhat opposed according to the types of centers, their scale and their number of years : en particular, were more opposed the centers less than a year in the accreditation and the teachers of the 3rd-5th scale class. But also the percentage of reapplication after expiration was elevated. The reasons why they would not reapply were a working power of child care, a little favor on the accreditation, self-control of the centers, etc. Second, about the effects after the accreditation, most of them were positive in the accreditation system for the improvement of a qualitative level of centers. And there were also an improvement of the centers and their speciality, the positive changes of child care program and educational process, and parents high recognition in the community. Third, for the methods of improvement after the accreditation, most of them claimed for a continual financial support, a supply of the piece rate for the teachers. In addition, there were imminent complements: reeducation, supervision by the experts, diversity and actuality of certification index, management and inspection after the accreditation. Lastly, it was revealed that the actual condition for maintenance and the management after the accreditation in general made a good management. The centers often made a check making a good use of an accreditation index, and made an effective management to maintain the accreditation sphere, and made various efforts for the management after the fact, trying teachers education and a self-control, encouraging learning. But it proved that it was difficult to maintain and manage it after the fact: teachers speciality and their overwork, management of special activities, financial problems, etc. They made efforts comparatively to improve center environments and educational programs for the maintenance of actual conditions of the accreditation. The national and public centers in the types and the 6th-10th class in the scales were evaluated to make a better maintenance and management in seven items by index. And the other factors didn t have almost influenced.