교류분석 이론에 기반한 청소년용 시간구조화 척도개발 및 타당화 연구

A Study on the Development and Validation of Time Structuring Scale for adolescents Based on the theory of transaction analysis

본 연구의 목적은 교류분석 이론에 근거한 인정자극 추구 패턴인 청소년용 시간구조화 척도개발 및 타당성을 검증하는 것이다. 이를 위해 교류분석의 구조화 개념을 바탕으로 166개 예비문항을 제작한 후 내용타당성 검증을 통해 90문항을 선정하였다. 연구대상은 청소년 2,095명(남 848명, 여 1,247명)으로 대도시 거주 15세~18세로 중고등학교 재학생이었고, 2차례의 예비조사 자료 분석을 통해 본조사 문항으로 최종 60문항을 선정하였다. 예비문항의 요인분석 적합성은 KMO 표본적합도와 Bartlett 구형성 검정값이 적합하였다. 또한 요인분석에서 요인의 수는 교류분석 이론에서 제시한 6요인(폐쇄, 의식, 활동, 잡담, 게임, 친밀)이 주성분으로 확인되었으며, 최종 각요인별 10개 문항씩 총 60문항이 시간구조화 척도로 선정되었다. 신뢰도 검증 결과 문항 간 내적 일관성 Cronbach’s α는 .890~.751, 검사-재검사의 경우 검사가 .892~.772이었고, 재검사는 .904~.791이었다. 반분검사 신뢰도의 경우 홀수문항은 .821~.615이었으며, 짝수문항은 .838~.639이었다. 이를 통해 개발된 시간구조화 척도가 청소년을 위한 표준화 검사 도구로 활용될 수 있음이 밝혀졌다. 마지막으로 본 연구의 의의 및 제한점과 향후 연구에 대해 제언하였다.

The purpose of this study is to verify the development and validity of a time structuring scale for adolescents, a pattern of pursuing recognition stimulation based on the theory of transaction analysis. To this end, 166 preliminary questions were produced based on the concept of transaction analysis's time structure, and 90 questions were selected through content validity verification. The subjects of the study were 2,095 adolescents(848 men and 1,247 women), who were middle and high school students aged 15 to 18 living in large cities, and the final 60 questions were selected as the main survey questions through two preliminary survey data analysis. For the suitability of factor analysis of the preliminary question, the KMO sample suitability and Bartlett sphericity test values were suitable. In addition, as for the number of factors in factor analysis, six factors (withdrawals, rituals, activites, pastimes, games, and intimacy) suggested by the theory of transaction analysis were identified as the main components, and a total of 60 questions, 10 questions for each factor, were selected as time structuring scale. As a result of reliability verification, the internal consistency Cronbach's α between items was .890-.751, and in the case of test-retest, the test was .892-.772, and the re-test was .904-.791. In the case of the reliability of the split-half, the odd-numbered questions were .821-.615, and the even-numbered questions were .838-.639. It was found that the time structuring scale developed through this can be used as a standardized test tool for adolescents. Finally, the significance and limitations of this study and future research were suggested.