본연구는유아의 연령과내러티브유형이 내러티브구성력과논리적 응집력에 미치는 영향을 살펴보고자 한다. 이를 위해 만 3세 16 명 , 4세 16명, 5세 18명을 대상으로 개인적 내러티브와 가상적 내러티브룰 녹음한 후 전사하였다. 내러티브 구성력과 논리적 응집력을내러티브유형에 따라분석하였다. 자료분석은 3( 연령 : 만 3세 , 만 4세 , 만 5세) X (2) （내 러티브 유형 : 가상적 내러티브, 개인적 내러티브) 반복측정 이원분산분석과 Scheffe 검증을 적용하였다. 본 연구의 걷과는 다움과 같다. 내러티브 구성력을 요소별로 살펴보면, 시간적 배열, 특정 에피소드ㆍ문제행동, 정점ㆍ문제해결, 종결은 5세가 4세와 3세보다 높았고 4세와 3세간에는차이가없었다. 논리적 응집력을 요소별로 살펴보면, 단순등위 관계 접속사, 시각온 5세가 4세보다, 4세가 3세보다 높았다. 시간관계 접속사, 대상, 장소, 기타는 5세가 4세와 3세보다 높았고 4세와 3세간에는 차이가 없었다. 또한 단순등위 관계 접속A}는 가상적 내러티브가 높았고 시간 관계접속사는 개인적 내러티브가 높았다. 그리고 인과관계 접속사는 4세에서만 가상적 내러티브에서 높았다.
The purpose of this study was to explore the effects of age and type of narrative style on preschooler's narrative components and logical cohesion. Forty eight children from 3-year-old to 5-year-old were joined in this study. The children's personal and fictional narratives were collected through one-on-one interviews which were recorded and transcribed. The data were analyzed 3(age: 3-, 4-, 5-year-old) ×(2)(narrative type: personal, fictional) using a repeated measures two-way ANOVA and Scheffé test. The results of this study were as follows. On the narrative components, when looking at temporal arrangement, specific episode problematic behavior, peak problem-solving, ․ ․ and closing, results indicated that 5-year-olds were higher than 4- and 3-year-olds, and no difference between 4- and 3-year-olds. On the logical cohesion, when looking at simple․coordinate relative conjunction and vision in logical cohesion, results indicated that 5-year-olds were higher than 4-year-olds, and 4-year-olds were higher than 3-year-olds. In time-relevant conjunction, subject, place and others, results indicated that 5-year-olds were higher than 4- and 3-year-olds, and no difference between 4- and 3-year-olds. Moreover results indicated that for fictional narrative style, 4-year-olds had a high causal conjunction.
(0)
(0)