Orthodontic tooth movement after periodontal regeneration of intrabony defects
- 대한치과교정학회
- The Korean Journal of Orthodontics
- 제54권 제1호
-
2024.013 - 15 (13 pages)
-
DOI : 10.4041/kjod24.007
- 2
The prevalence of intrabony defects in patients with advanced periodontitis stages III and IV is high. These patients usually need both periodontal treatment and orthodontic therapy, including tooth movement through bone defects, to improve masticatory function, aesthetics, and overall quality of life. Clinical practice guidelines recommend periodontal regenerative surgical interventions to resolve these defects and propose initiating orthodontic tooth movement (OTM) once periodontal therapy goals have been met. Surgical interventions using various regenerative technologies like barrier membranes and enamel matrix proteins, combined or not with bone replacement grafts, have proven effective in regenerating lost periodontal tissues. However, the combination of periodontal and orthodontic treatments requires consideration of how periodontal regenerative therapies influence OTM. Studies suggest that regenerated bone may differ in density, composition, vascularity, and cellular activity, potentially affecting the speed and efficiency of OTM, and potential root resorption of moved teeth. Understanding the sequence and timing of implementing OTM after regenerative periodontal interventions is crucial due to their interlinked processes of bone resorption and formation. This narrative review aims to uncover scientific evidence regarding these combined treatments, examining the impacts of different regenerative technologies on OTM and delineating their advantages, limitations, and best practices.
INTRODUCTION
REGENERATIVE TECHNOLOGIES USED FOR PROMOTING PERIODONTAL REGENERATION IN HUMAN INTRABONY DEFECTS
INFLUENCE OF DIFFERENT GRAFT MATERIALS ON ORTHODONTIC TOOTH MOVEMENT: EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES
NFLUENCE OF DIFFERENT GRAFT MATERIALS ON ORTHODONTIC TOOTH MOVEMENT: CLINICAL STUDIES
TIMING OF OTM INITIATION AFTER REGENERATIVE SURGERY
MAGNITUDE OF FORCE OF OTM
CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS
CONCLUSIONS
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
FUNDING
REFERENCES
(0)
(0)