상세검색
최근 검색어 전체 삭제
다국어입력
즐겨찾기0
학술저널

Phenylephrine versus norepinephrine in regional anesthesia for cesarean delivery: a brief review

  • 9
2024.png

Recently, regional anesthesia, including spinal anesthesia, has become a standard anesthetic method for cesarean sections. Sympathetic blockade caused by hypotension after spinal an-esthesia causes nausea, vomiting, and dizziness and affects maternal hemodynamics, which reduces blood flow to the placenta, potentially leading to fetal acidosis. Therefore, the prevention of hypotension after spinal anesthesia is essential for the anesthetic management of cesarean sections. Interest in the use of vasopressors to treat or prevent hypotension following spinal anesthesia has increased, leading to a vigorous debate regarding the optimal choice of agent. Traditionally, ephedrine has been the vasopressor of choice. However, phenylephrine and nor-epinephrine are now preferred because of their superior efficacy in managing hypotension after spinal anesthesia. Regardless of the agent used, administering these medications ensured en-hanced maternal hemodynamic stability.

INTRODUCTION

EVOLUTION OF VASOPRESSOR USE FOR MANAGING HYPOTENSION AFTER SPINAL ANESTHESIA IN CESAREAN DELIVERY

COMMONLY USED VASOPRESSORS DURING SPINAL ANESTHESIA FOR CESAREAN SECTION

VASOPRESSOR COMPARISON: PHENYLEPHRINE VS. NOREPINEPHRINE

FUTURE RECOMMENDATIONS

CONCLUSION

(0)

(0)

로딩중